Danish High Court’s Verdict on Cross-Border Severance Payment Taxation

A recent Danish High Court verdict sets a new standard for taxing international severance payments. The ruling impacts both individual taxpayers and multinational companies in Denmark, clarifying how Danish tax laws intersect with double taxation treaties, particularly with China.
A picture showing maps of Denmark and China with the Chinese Yuan symbol as well as DKK for Danish Kroner and a court gravel

Danish High Court Rules on Cross-Border Severance Payment Taxation:
A Case Between an Individual and the Danish Tax Ministry

In a recent decision that stands to impact international employees working in Denmark, the Danish High Court has ruled on a complex case involving an individual known as “A” and the Danish Tax Ministry. The dispute hinged on how A’s income, including a severance payment, should be taxed under both Danish law and any existing double taxation treaties between Denmark and China.

The Points of Contention

“A” argued that his severance payment should fall under the Danish Tax Assessment Act § 33 A entitling “A” to a reduction in the Danish income after the exemption with progression method. “A” argued that the payment was made by a Finnish company, not the Danish branch where he worked.

On the other side, the Tax Ministry contended that the source of the severance payment exempts it from the Danish Tax Assessment Act § 33 A’s application. They argued that severance payments do not fall under the Tax Assessment Act § 33 A, with the exemption if the severance payment solely is derived from a foreign country.

High Court's Decision

The High Court ruled in favour of the Tax Ministry, confirming that A’s severance payment is indeed subject to Section 7 U of the Tax Assessment Act and therefor does not fall under the Tax Assessment Act § 33 A. They argued that the severance payment was derived from “A’s” entire employment with and not just from his time in China.

The Verdict

The case concluded with the High Court upholding the ruling of the lower court. As a result, “A“ was not entitled to reduce his Danish income with the severance payment af the exemption with progression method.

Implications for International Employees

This case serves as an important precedent for international employees and companies operating in Denmark, emphasising the necessity of understanding both Danish tax laws and any relevant international tax treaties.

Don't navigate cross-border taxation alone!

If you’re dealing with a similar international tax situation, schedule a consultation with our experienced tax experts, and avoid costly pitfalls.

A picture showing the Crossbord delivery team of experts

Latest news

EFTA Court clarifies when a minor activity must be disregarded in social security coordination

On the 3rd of July, 2026, the EFTA Court clarified how a minor activity should be treated when authorities decide which country’s social security system applies to a person working across borders. In Case E-26/25 the Court held that an activity generating less than 0.5% of a person’s income creates a strong presumption that it is marginal and must be disregarded, a point that matters to any employer whose staff hold an A1 certificate across two or more European Economic Area (EEA) states.

Ask us about this topic

* We process your details solely to answer your question and retain them no longer than necessary for that purpose. See our privacy policy for your rights, including access, correction, and erasure.

Scroll to Top